IoT Knowledge Base
Learn the key concepts you need to know. Without the technical jargon.
IoT Reports & Guides
In-depth research, white-papers and guides from Pelion.
Blog Articles & News
The latest insights on industry trends, best practices, and Pelion announcements.
Events & Webinars
Upcoming events, online sessions, and expert-led webinars
About Us
Our mission, values, team, and the solutions we offer in the IoT space.
The Team
Meet our team behind Pelion's effortless connectivity.
Careers
Job opportunities, company culture, and the benefits of joining our team.
Sustainability
Our commitment to environmentally responsible practices.
April 17, 2023 — 4 min read
Questions in the IoT connectivity space are often based around the capabilities of eSIM and what technologies it can currently support. One that is particularly common is if you can combine the profile swapping capabilities of an eSIM with the ultra-efficient NB-IoT network technology.
In theory, you can put an NB-IoT profile on an eUICC, however, at present there is no viable method to change profiles which defeats the purpose of using eSIM and in doing this, would put your device at a disadvantage. What’s currently stopping the pairing of NB-IoT with eSIM is the technology in between. NB-IoT does not support SMS protocols of which eSIM relies on to function - the two conflict in the way they operate. An eSIM changes profiles when an SMS is sent to the device which is then received, and a separate SMS is then sent back. Therefore, without SMS there would be no communication between platform and device. Hence why NB-IoT would not allow for a profile change in its current form.
eSIM and NB-IoT evolved independently to solve different problems in the same space and both made significant advances in mobile standards. NB-IoT (and other LPWAN tech) focuses on battery usage and device security. NB-IoT is also mobile operator driven and best for very low data applications whereas eSIM focuses more heavily on the need to remove the physical sim card as IoT devices become smaller and more constrained. eSIM does also focus on security but on a hardware, level as opposed to a network level like NB-IoT which has what has potentially created a disconnect between the two technologies. An interesting observation by our Director of product is that when new technologies get created to serve the IoT space, the GSMA usually makes it work together but this didn’t happen for NB-IoT which could also have played a part in the disassociation.
It's a common train of thought in the IoT community that NB-IoT will stay as is but eSIM will evolve to better compliment and serve NB-IoT. The SMS protocols that eSIM relies on is a relatively old protocol and it makes sense to abandon older tech for its newer counterpart. If there is an evolution in remote sim provisioning that bridges the gap between the two technologies, then it is thought that eSIM could massively accelerate the scale and adoption of NB-IoT. If this happens it could result in some really great solutions taking advantage of the complimentary benefits of both technologies, but for now, this is just speculation.
Today, if you want an eSIM based LPWAN solution your best option is LTE-M and CATM1 technologies. LTE-M based technologies support SMS is and as previously stated, this is what allows the connectivity technologies and eSIM to co-exist and work together. In using eSIM with CAT-M a device can also achieve higher band width as well as being able to change profile should the IoT device require it.
To briefly summarise, we recommend using CAT-M if your device needs to be able to perform profile switching either now or in the near future. Whilst it may be possible to use NB-IoT and eSIM together there is no guarantee that the advancement in remote sim provisioning will even happen. Therefore, the IoT community must bear this in mind when considering NB-IoT as a connectivity option if eSIM is either required or a desired factor.
The IoT space has moved on a lot from physical sim card that catered for voice and SMS to being heavily data driven and focused on the future proofing of devices. As always, when putting together a solution we recommend carefully assessing the priorities for your deployment - both shorter and longer term. Once those priorities have been decided, then it is time to choose your technology. For example, if your priorities are heavily focused on future-proofing and retaining maximum flexibility then eSIM is the answer and that means for now, you will not be able to take advantage of NB-IoT. Alternatively, if what you care about is keeping costs low and minimising the power usage of your IoT device then NB-IoT can still be a great choice, it just means sacrificing flexibility. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. If you want help spec’ing the right solution the Pelion team is always happy to help.
For a foundation level insight into eSIM, please read our eSIM basics blog at What is eSIM for IoT - the basics - Pelion.